Tools

Back to the Top

Series

Tweaked, Aβ-Antibodies Cross Blood Brain 'Border' (Bye Bye, Barrier?)

( 2 Articles Available, 0 Articles Pending )

Scientists are honing transferrin receptors to whisk bulky, anti-Aβ antibodies throughout the brain without setting off ARIA and anemia. By halving the effector function of their antibody transport vehicle, Denali researchers blunted red blood cell loss and vascular inflammation, without compromising engagement with Aβ plaques. In a related review, scientists propose rethinking the blood-brain barrier as more a bustling border crossing than a static wall. 

Tweaked, Aβ-Antibodies Cross Blood-Brain ‘Border’ (Bye-Bye, Barrier?)

Far from a static wall, the so-called “blood-brain barrier” is a dynamic, bustling interface that allows select groups of molecules to pass in and out of the brain. Which proteins and nutrients can cross varies according to the needs of the cells on either side. While probing the nuances of this “border,” scientists are honing techniques for transporting therapeutics into every nook and cranny of the brain’s parenchyma, while circumnavigating the brain’s amyloid-laden arteries. Case in point, in a preprint posted on bioRxiv on August 14, Joy Zuchero and colleagues at Denali Therapeutics in South San Francisco described their latest overhaul of an antibody transport vehicle.

ATVs are antibodies sporting a transferrin receptor (TfR) binding site within one of their two effector domains. In mouse models, the authors found that halving the effector function of this construct mitigated depletion of TfR-expressing red blood cells in the periphery, but maintained the antibody’s ability to vanquish its target in the brain—in this case, Aβ plaques. Compared to a regular anti-Aβ antibody, the ATV version was better distributed throughout the brain and provoked less ARIA in perivascular regions.

“Overall these are very encouraging results that could eventually lead to new and safer treatment paradigms for AD,” commented Stephen Salloway of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island.

The preprint comes on the heels of a review penned by Denali’s Robert Thorne along with a cadre of academic scientists. Together, they offer a reconceptualization of the BBB, proposing that the last “B” should stand for “border” instead of “barrier.” Not unlike a border that allows for regulated exchange of people and goods tailored to a country’s specific needs and relationships, the interfaces between the blood and brain are also selective and adaptive, they argue (see next story).

A scant proportion of large molecules make it from the blood into the brain. For therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, that’s at most 0.5 percent of what’s in the periphery. Those that do get in tend to cross at the interface between the blood and CSF, rather than via the capillaries crisscrossing the parenchyma. Many of the border crossers may then get waylaid within CSF-adjacent spaces, holding up distribution throughout the parenchyma and arrival at their intended targets, such as Aβ plaques.

To get around this problem, scientists at Denali and at other companies take advantage of the transferrin receptor. The TfR resides on the surface of endothelial cells lining the brain vasculature, with the highest expression in the smallest vessels. Called ATV, Denali’s construct features a TfR binding domain integrated into one of the Fc domains of an antibody (May 2020 news). Preclinical studies are ongoing for ATVs against BACE1, TREM2, Aβ, and other targets.

Another TfR-based approach is Roche’s Brain Shuttle, in which a TfR-specific Fab fragment is attached to the end of one of the two Fc regions of a therapeutic antibody. Trontinemab—essentially gantenerumab equipped with a Brain Shuttle—is in Phase 1/2. It entered the brain more readily than its predecessor while provoking hardly any amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (Mar 2024 conference news). The vascular changes underlying ARIA are the Achilles heel of Aβ-targeted therapies, and scientists are searching for ways to avoid them (Aug 2024 conference news).

LALA to the Rescue. Effector-quashing LALA mutations were introduced into either or both Fc domains of ATV constructs. Only when LALA resided on the same Fc domain (ATVcisLALA or ATVLALA) as the TfR binding site were red blood cells spared. [Courtesy of Pizzo et al., bioRxiv, 2024.]

One downside of using the TfR is that reticulocytes—the predecessors of red blood cells—also express it. Indeed, trontinemab and early versions of Denali’s ATVs target these cells. This can lead to anemia.

Previously, Denali scientists reported that introduction of two mutations—L234A/L235A, aka LALA—into the Fc effector domains stifled this anti-RBC activity. Trouble is, these mutations also compromised the antibodies’ effector function against their targets. For the current study, first author Michelle Pizzo and colleagues struck a compromise, inserting the LALA mutations into only one of the ATV’s Fc domains. In short, when they introduced these effector-dampening mutations into the same Fc domain housing the TfR binding region—cisLALA—it substantially doused the antibody’s effector activity directed against TfR-expressing cells. When they introduced cisLALA into an anti-Aβ ATV and injected that into TfRmu/hu mice that express human TfR, it spared red blood cells. In contrast, RBCs plummeted in mice injected with ATV-Aβ constructs that lacked the LALA mutations, or only carried them on the opposing (trans) Fc region.

Roche scientists led by Per-Ola Freskgård, now at BioArctic, previously reported that the attachment of their TfR-targeted Fab fragment to the end of their antibody’s Fc domain blocked the domain’s effector function when the construct was bound to TfR (Jan 2018 news). Therefore, they concluded that no effector-dampening mutations were needed.

How would this configuration compare to cisLALA in terms of sparing red blood cells in mice? To find out, Pizzo and colleagues compared them head-to-head. They attached a TfR-targeted Fab fragment to the Fc region of their fully functional anti-Aβ antibody. When injected into mice, it triggered a reduction in reticulocytes, while the ATVcisLALA antibody did not. The results suggested that their new approach to building ATVs blunts the loss of erythrocytes, the authors concluded.

Despite sparing reticulocytes, the cisLALA mutations did not undermine the antibody’s ability to attack the target of its Fab arms, i.e., Aβ plaques. The scientists injected 5xFAD mice every three days for 12 days with a high dose of different antibody constructs, achieving a similar brain exposure for each. They found that the ATVcisLALA-Aβ antibody recruited about as many microglia to Aβ plaques as did the unmodified anti-Aβ antibody, whereas the effectorless ATV-LALA-Aβ antibody summoned fewer microglia. Both the unmodified anti-Aβ and ATVcisLALA-Aβ similarly reduced the area of small Aβ plaques, though neither put a dent in large plaques during this short treatment.

Freskgård noted that according to in vitro experiments described in the manuscript, ATVCisLALA did slightly dampen the antibody’s cytotoxicity against Fab-bound targets. He wondered if this might lower potency in removing Aβ plaques. “It would be great to see more detailed in vivo potency data addressing this aspect,” Freskgård wrote to Alzforum.

The scientists next compared the brain distribution of their ATVs to that of standard antibodies, and assessed how distribution affected the treated brain’s vascular woes. They found that after a single dose, the concentration of ATVCisLALA-Aβ in total brain lysates topped that of a regular anti-Aβ antibody by five- to eightfold. Crucially, the whereabouts of the ATV and unmodified antibodies were strikingly different. While anti-Aβ antibodies milled about in CSF-adjacent, perivascular spaces, ATVCisLALA-Aβ pervaded the parenchyma of an entire sagittal brain section, including deep brain regions (image below).

Down to Distribution. Unmodified anti-Aβ antibodies (top row) congregated along connected regions in the choroid plexus (middle), while ATVCisLALA-Aβ antibodies (bottom row) fanned out across the cortical surface and associated with small structures (right).

Deploying tissue clearing followed by three-dimensional imaging, the scientists saw that while unmodified, anti-Aβ antibodies seemed stuck along what appeared to be major surface arteries such as those coursing through the leptomeninges, ATVCisLALA-Aβ huddled with small dots distributed throughout the parenchyma. Separate staining of the other half of each brain suggested that these dots were parenchymal amyloid plaques, while the larger, connected swaths bound by the anti-Aβ antibodies were likely vascular amyloid, akin to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA).

Would this even distribution of ATVCisLALA-Aβ sidestep ARIA? The scientists strapped their ATV construct to a notorious ARIA instigator: a mouse version of 3D6, aka bapineuzumab. In 5xFAD mice, this antibody reportedly makes a good ARIA model (Mar 2024 conference news). Indeed, as per mouse MRI, the unmodified 3D6 antibody provoked ARIA-like events in all 10 5xFAD mice used in this study, while an equal dose of ATVCisLALA-3D6 triggered a single ARIA-like lesion in one mouse, despite its higher penetration into the brain. When matched with unmodified 3D6 for brain exposure, ATVCisLALA-3D6 provoked nary any ARIA. Neither did ATV-3D6, which retained full effector function.

The MRI findings jibed with what the researchers found via histopathology, namely, that ushering 3D6 into the brain via ATV neutralized its inflammatory threat against the cerebrovasculature, while unmodified 3D6 antibodies wreaked havoc.

To Zuchero and co-author Thorne, the data suggest that sans ATV, antibodies trickle into the brain via a tortuous, indirect route. They first pass from blood into CSF, then work their way across the brain’s surface and into the perivascular spaces around large-caliber leptomeningeal vessels. This is where vascular amyloid accumulates—ground zero for ARIA. “By contrast, our ATV:Aβ molecule distributes to the brain mostly by transport across the microvessels which highly express the transferrin receptor, essentially bypassing the problematic part of the vessel where interaction with vascular amyloid can lead to ARIA,” Zuchero and Thorne wrote to Alzforum.

Costantino Iadecola of New York’s Weill Cornell Medical College called the findings promising and timely. Risk of ARIA besets the approved anti-Aβ antibodies (Aug 2024 conference news).

Iadecola said that Pizzo’s findings jibe with one hypothesis about what causes ARIA, i.e., that conventional, intravenous antibodies get marooned in perivascular spaces, where CAA happens. This convergence instigates a pro-inflammatory storm that destabilizes vessel walls, leading to the swelling and hemorrhage that presents as ARIA. Iadecola favors a variation of this, whereby the therapeutic antibody itself exacerbates Aβ accumulation in the perivascular space, which riles macrophages there. Iadecola recently reported that the resulting vascular damage is worse when these border-associated macrophages express ApoE4 (Iadecola et al., 2024). Given that, he wondered how Pizzo et al.’s experiments would turn out in ApoE4 mice.

Another view is that immune complexes between Aβ and antibodies transform microglia into a maladaptive state, causing ARIA, Iadecola noted (Aug 2024 conference news). He thinks it’s possible that all three mechanisms play a role. “With something as complex as the brain vasculature, it’s never just one thing,” he told Alzforum.

Given this complexity, Thorne and other scientists recently made the case to view the BBB more like an actively managed, dynamic border between countries, rather than a static wall. For more on that, check out our next story (Oct 2024 news).—Jessica Shugart

References

News Citations

  1. Reconceptualizing the BBB: Is It Time to Swap ‘Barrier’ for ‘Border'?
  2. Molecular Transport Vehicle Shuttles Therapies into Brain
  3. Fast Plaque Clearance with Little ARIA? So Teases Trontinemab at AD/PD 2024
  4. Two New Deaths on Leqembi Highlight Need to Better Manage ARIA
  5. Antibody Shuttle Rouses Anti-Aβ Response in Brain without Waking the Periphery
  6. Mouse Models and Markers for Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, ARIA
  7. Implicated in ARIA: Perivascular Macrophages and Microglia

Therapeutics Citations

  1. Trontinemab
  2. Bapineuzumab

Paper Citations

  1. Iadecola C, Anfray A, Schaeffer S, Hattori Y, Santisteban M, Casey N, Wang G, Strickland M, Zhou P, Holtzman D, Anrather J, Park L. Cell autonomous role of border associated macrophages in ApoE4 neurovascular dysfunction and susceptibility to white matter injury. Res Sq. 2023 Aug 4; PubMed.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Reconceptualizing the BBB: Is It Time to Swap ‘Barrier’ for ‘Border'?

The image of the “blood-brain barrier” as a static wall that shields the brain from the rest of the body is crumbling. A group of scientists argue, in a review published in Fluids and Barriers of the CNS earlier this year, that it’s time to adopt a more apt metaphor. Jan Pieter Konsman and Jerome Badaut of the University of Bordeaux, France; Jean-François Ghersi-Egea of Lyon Neurosciences Research Center, France; and Robert Thorne of Denali Therapeutics in South San Francisco, likened the blood-brain interface to a border crossing between countries, whereby people, goods, and taxes are exchanged to serve the needs of the countries on either side. Just as such borders adapt to changing times, the “blood-brain border” adapts in both time and space, adjusting its list of “approved” molecules depending on age and a healthy or diseased local environment. This is a better metaphor than a purely obstructive barrier standing in the way of CNS-targeted therapeutics.

“The term border does more justice to the flexibility observed in the (patho)physiology of the blood–brain interface, while avoiding the negative connotation of disruption or rupture,” the authors wrote. They see the new term as a way to “stimulate new drug approaches to modulate the properties of CNS endothelial and epithelial layers, or take advantage of endogenous systems, rather than finding ways to ‘break the barrier’ to facilitate drug delivery to the CNS.”

Bustling Border. In this schematic of the border between Switzerland and European Union nations, the exchange of people, taxes, and goods at crossing points adapts as relationships between countries evolve. Similarly, the blood-brain border shifts in time and space. [Courtesy of Badaut et al., Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, 2024.]

Scientists who study the intricacies of the brain’s extensive vasculature have long known that selective molecules traverse it via different mechanisms. Still, many emphasize the restrictiveness of the BBB, focusing on the barrier properties of the tight junctions that physically seal spaces between endothelial cells lining vessels. Yet squeezing across these crevices is not the way most molecules—particularly larger ones—manage to cross. Instead, a variety of selective paths, such as solute channels, receptor-mediated transcytosis systems, and vesicular trafficking are at work across the vasculature, the scientists emphasized.

Jürgen Götz of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, welcomed the change in terminology. With his work using ultrasound to temporarily open the BBB, Götz acknowledged that he initially viewed it as a barrier to be breached (Mar 2015 news). Yet further studies have continued to unveil the nuanced mechanisms underlying changes in so-called BBB “permeability,” including those that change with age and disease. Götz noted a study led by Tony Wyss-Coray of Stanford University. It showed that, at least in mice, while plasma proteins readily permeate the healthy brain parenchyma, their uptake flags in the aged brain due to a shift from ligand-specific, receptor-mediated modes of transport, to nonspecific caveolar transcytosis (Jul 2020 news).

Operative transport mechanisms vary substantially from segment to segment across the cerebral circulation, noted Costantino Iadecola of Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, who was not involved in the review. For example, at the capillary level, the BBB is dominated by solute transporter carriers, while larger vessels favor vesicular transport mechanisms, he said. “There is this zonal diversity to the interface with the blood, and that’s only one of the interfaces in the brain.”

Intricate Interfaces. In addition to the blood-brain border (top right), the brain’s other interfaces include the inner blood-CSF border within the choroid plexus (bottom left) and the outer blood-CSF border within the leptomeninges (bottom right). Each border has distinct cellular, molecular and structural attributes. [Courtesy of Badaut et al., Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, 2024.]

Other interfaces include the blood-CSF borders, such as the one between the blood and the choroid plexus, as well as between the blood and leptomeningeal spaces on the surface of the brain (image above). Denali’s Thorne takes the view that it is at these CSF borders, rather than capillary blood-brain interfaces, where minuscule amounts of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies tend to cross. After traversing the fenestrated blood vessels that predominate within the choroid plexus, these large macromolecules get snagged in the surrounding stroma before some of them cross into the CSF. There, they travel across the brain surface and into perivascular spaces around large caliber vessels that traverse the leptomeninges. These spaces are also where cerebral amyloid angiopathy occurs. Thorne and other scientists think that when anti-Aβ antibodies latch onto this vascular amyloid, the inflammatory consequences that manifest as ARIA ensue.

To avoid this risk and to improve delivery into the brain, some companies are taking advantage of the transferrin receptor to whisk monoclonal antibodies across. Notably, TfR expression is highest within the microvasculature, rather than at larger vessels where CAA accumulates. An appreciation for the diversity of transport mechanisms at work across the cerebrovasculature may thus allow scientists to side-step damaging responses and deliver their drugs more broadly throughout the brain parenchyma, as described in the previous story (Oct 2024 news).

The concept of a blood-brain border matches the military-inspired words used to describe immune cells that “patrol” these borders, and “infiltrate” the brain when recruited by cells on the other side. For example, the role of T cells in exacerbating neurodegenerative disease has become increasingly appreciated in recent years (Mar 2023 news). Moreover, Iadecola and other scientists have found that macrophages residing in the perivascular space—aptly named “border-associated macrophages” (BAMs)—play an important part in surveilling border crossings, but are capable of unleashing a deadly inflammatory cascade of free radicals that exacerbates CAA and may even cause ARIA (Apr 2023 conference news; Aug 2024 conference news). 

“The roles that these brain macrophages play, in addition to their strategic positioning in what can be considered to be defensive buffer zones along blood–brain interfaces, fully justifies the name border-associated macrophages, and further encourages us to consider these interfaces as biological borders,” the authors wrote.

Iadecola applauded the authors for starting this discussion, and agreed that “border” is a more appropriate term than “barrier.” However, he added that “border” barely scratches the surface of the complexities of the brain’s diverse vasculature. “With so many different interfaces and different types of borders within them, maybe we should be splitting instead of lumping,” he said. Still, he said that the brain’s myriad interfaces do serve a common purpose, that is, to maintain homeostasis, whether by delivering nutrients, clearing junk, healing a wound, or quashing an infection.—Jessica Shugart

References

News Citations

  1. Stop, Hey, What’s That Sound? ... Amyloid Is Going Down?
  2. Blood-Brain Barrier Surprise: Proteins Flood into Young Brain
  3. Tweaked, Aβ-Antibodies Cross Blood-Brain ‘Border’ (Bye-Bye, Barrier?)
  4. Neurodegeneration—It’s Not the Tangles, It’s the T Cells
  5. Macrophages Blamed for Vascular Trouble in ApoE4 Carriers
  6. Implicated in ARIA: Perivascular Macrophages and Microglia

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading