Overview

Clinical Phenotype: Alzheimer's Disease
Position: (GRCh38/hg38):Chr11:121586287 G>A
Position: (GRCh37/hg19):Chr11:121456996 G>A
dbSNP ID: rs145960733
Coding/Non-Coding: Coding
DNA Change: Substitution
Expected Protein Consequence: Missense
Codon Change: GGT to AGT
Reference Isoform: SORL1 Isoform 1 (2214 aa)
Genomic Region: Exon 27

Findings

In a study that included 15,808 Alzheimer’s cases and 16,097 control subjects from multiple European and American cohorts, this allele was observed eight times—four times among the AD cases and four times among the controls (Holstege et al., 2022). A mega-analysis of these data did not find an association between the variant and AD risk.

Previously, one Alzheimer’s case and two controls were found to be heterozygous carriers of this variant, in a Dutch sample of 640 AD cases and 1268 controls. No additional carriers were found in a pan-European cohort of 1255 cases and 1938 controls (Holstege et al., 2017). The cohorts comprising the Dutch sample contributed to the 2022 study cited above.

This variant also was reported in one of 5198 AD cases and three of 4491 controls in a dataset from the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP), consisting of subjects of non-Hispanic Caucasian ancestry from whom whole-exome sequencing data were available (Campion et al., 2019). The ADSP also contributed data to the 2022 study.

The G1258S variant is classified as likely benign by the criteria of Holstege et al. (Holstege et al., 2017).

Functional Consequences

The SORL1 protein contains 11 complement-type repeats (CRs). A majority of known SORL1 ligands, including APP, bind to the CR cluster. Glycine-1258 is located at position 38 in CR5 and is one of a pair of glycines—located at positions 27 and 38—that is conserved in eight of the 11 CRs. Based on this degree of conservation, Andersen and colleagues predicted that substitutions of glycine at residue 1258 are moderately likely to increase AD risk (Andersen et al., 2023).

Substitutions of a conserved glycine at position 38 were found in 26 AD cases and 15 controls when the mega dataset cited above (Holstege et al., 2022) was expanded to 18,959 AD cases and 21,893 controls (Holstege et al., 2023). In aggregate, these variants associated with an increased risk of AD (odds ratio: 2.0; 95% confidence interval: 1.06 – 3.78; p = 0.040).

A pathogenic variant was identified in a homologous position in complement factor I (CFI), leading to CFI deficiency (Andersen et al., 2023).

The G1258S variant was predicted to be deleterious by SIFT, Mutation Taster, and PolyPhen-2 (Campion et al., 2019).

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

References

Paper Citations

1. Holstege H, Hulsman M, Charbonnier C, Grenier-Boley B, Quenez O, Grozeva D, van Rooij JG, Sims R, Ahmad S, Amin N, Norsworthy PJ, Dols-Icardo O, Hummerich H, Kawalia A, Amouyel P, Beecham GW, Berr C, Bis JC, Boland A, Bossù P, Bouwman F, Bras J, Campion D, Cochran JN, Daniele A, Dartigues JF, Debette S, Deleuze JF, Denning N, DeStefano AL, Farrer LA, Fernández MV, Fox NC, Galimberti D, Genin E, Gille JJ, Le Guen Y, Guerreiro R, Haines JL, Holmes C, Ikram MA, Ikram MK, Jansen IE, Kraaij R, Lathrop M, Lemstra AW, Lleó A, Luckcuck L, Mannens MM, Marshall R, Martin ER, Masullo C, Mayeux R, Mecocci P, Meggy A, Mol MO, Morgan K, Myers RM, Nacmias B, Naj AC, Napolioni V, Pasquier F, Pastor P, Pericak-Vance MA, Raybould R, Redon R, Reinders MJ, Richard AC, Riedel-Heller SG, Rivadeneira F, Rousseau S, Ryan NS, Saad S, Sanchez-Juan P, Schellenberg GD, Scheltens P, Schott JM, Seripa D, Seshadri S, Sie D, Sistermans EA, Sorbi S, van Spaendonk R, Spalletta G, Tesi N, Tijms B, Uitterlinden AG, van der Lee SJ, Visser PJ, Wagner M, Wallon D, Wang LS, Zarea A, Clarimon J, van Swieten JC, Greicius MD, Yokoyama JS, Cruchaga C, Hardy J, Ramirez A, Mead S, van der Flier WM, van Duijn CM, Williams J, Nicolas G, Bellenguez C, Lambert JC. Exome sequencing identifies rare damaging variants in ATP8B4 and ABCA1 as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet. 2022 Dec;54(12):1786-1794. Epub 2022 Nov 21 PubMed.
2. Holstege H, van der Lee SJ, Hulsman M, Wong TH, van Rooij JG, Weiss M, Louwersheimer E, Wolters FJ, Amin N, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Ikram MA, van Swieten JC, Meijers-Heijboer H, van der Flier WM, Reinders MJ, van Duijn CM, Scheltens P. Characterization of pathogenic SORL1 genetic variants for association with Alzheimer's disease: a clinical interpretation strategy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Aug;25(8):973-981. Epub 2017 May 24 PubMed.
3. Campion D, Charbonnier C, Nicolas G. SORL1 genetic variants and Alzheimer disease risk: a literature review and meta-analysis of sequencing data. Acta Neuropathol. 2019 Aug;138(2):173-186. Epub 2019 Mar 25 PubMed.
4. Andersen OM, Monti G, Jensen AM, deWaal M, Hulsman M, Olsen JG, Holstege H. Relying on the relationship with known disease-causing variants in homologous proteins to predict pathogenicity of SORL1 variants in Alzheimer's disease. 2023 Feb 27 10.1101/2023.02.27.524103 (version 1) bioRxiv.
5. Holstege H, deWaal MW, Tesi N, vanderLee SJ, ADESconsortium, ADSPconsortium, StEP-ADconsortium, Knight-ADRC, UCSF/NYGC/UAB, Vogel M, vanSpaendonk R, Hulsman M, Andersen OM. Effect of prioritized SORL1 missense variants supports clinical consideration for familial Alzheimer's Disease. 2023 Jul 16 10.1101/2023.07.13.23292622 (version 1) medRxiv.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading