Mutations

SORL1 S1187S (SNP 19)

Other Names: SNP 19

Overview

Clinical Phenotype: Alzheimer's Disease
Position: (GRCh38/hg38):Chr11:121577381 T>G
Position: (GRCh37/hg19):Chr11:121448090 T>G
dbSNP ID: rs2070045
Coding/Non-Coding: Coding
DNA Change: Substitution
Expected Protein Consequence: Silent
Codon Change: TCT to TCG
Reference Isoform: SORL1 Isoform 1 (2214 aa)
Genomic Region: Exon 25

Findings

This synonymous variant (S1187S, “SNP 19”) is among those initially described by Rogaeva et al. in 2007 (Rogaeva et al., 2007), when it was reported to be associated with an increased risk of AD in Caucasians. The variant was subsequently reported in many other studies, sometimes associated with AD risk and sometimes not (see table).

Meta-analyses of these studies have also yielded a variety of results. Among cohorts described as Caucasian or of European ancestry, the G allele has been associated with both increased (Liu et al., 2017; Reitz et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2016) and decreased (Reynolds et al., 2010) risks of AD or has not been significantly associated with disease (Cong et al., 2018; Li et al., 2008). In one meta-analysis focused on Asian cohorts, the G allele was reported to increase AD risk (Reitz et al., 2011), while two others did not find a significant association between the variant and AD (Cong et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2016). The results of meta-analyses that combined Caucasian and Asian subjects were also inconsistent (Cong et al., 2018; Jin et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016).

SNP 19 was not associated with MCI in a study of Han Chinese subjects (Chou et al., 2016) or with conversion from MCI to AD in a study of Italian and Italian-speaking Swiss subjects (Piscopo et al., 2015).

The variant did not associate with age-at-onset in Swedish dementia cases (~80 percent of whom were diagnosed with AD) (Reynolds, et al., 2010).

This variant is classified as likely pathogenic by the criteria of Holstege and colleagues (Holstege et al., 2017).

Linkage Disequilibrium

SNP 19 is in linkage disequilibrium with several other variants, including rs677078, rs17092943, rs4936636, rs4936637, rs3824966 (SNP 20), rs4936638, rs11218350, rs73595277 (SNP 21), rs1699102 (SNP 22), rs3824968 (SNP 23), rs2282649 (SNP 24), rs726601, rs1784931, and rs1010159 (SNP 25) in cohorts of European ancestry (Caglayan et al., 2012; Jin et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2017; Rogaeva et al., 2007); rs1699102 (SNP 22), rs3824968 (SNP 23), rs2282649 (SNP 24), and rs1010159 (SNP 25) in Asian cohorts (Jin et al., 2013; Ning et al., 2010); rs3824966 (SNP 20) and rs73595277 (SNP 21) in an African-American cohort (Rogaeva et al., 2007); and rs3824966 (SNP 20), rs1699102 (SNP 22), rs3824968 (SNP 23), rs2282649 (SNP 24), and rs1010159 (SNP 25) in a Mexican cohort (Toral-Rios et al., 2022).

In a large meta-analysis of data from the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project, seven SNPs in linkage disequilibrium with SNP 19 were all reported to be associated with late-onset AD (Liu et al., 2017).

Fluid Biomarkers

Generally, the S1187S variant was not found to associate with CSF biomarkers of AD—Aβ42 (Alexopoulos et al., 2011; Elias-Sonnenschein et al., 2013; Guo et al., 2012; Kauwe et al., 2010; Kölsch, et al., 2008; Reynolds, et al., 2010), total tau (Alexopoulos et al., 2011; Elias-Sonnenschein et al., 2013; Reynolds, et al., 2010), or phospho-tau (Alexopoulos et al., 2011; Elias-Sonnenschein et al., 2013). The SNP rs3824966, used as a proxy for the SNP 19 G allele, was reported to associate with increased levels of CSF total-tau in a set of AD subjects from ADNI and the German Dementia Competence Network (Louwersheimer et al., 2015).

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Markers

Several studies have investigated the relationships between SNP 19 and MRI markers.

SNP 19 did not associate with cerebral atrophy or white-matter hyperintensities in Caucasians or African Americans in the family-based Multi-Institutional Research in Alzheimer's Genetic Epidemiology (MIRAGE) Study (Cuenco et al., 2008). SNP rs3824966, a proxy for the SNP 19 G allele, was associated with greater hippocampal atrophy in AD patients from ADNI and the German Dementia Competence Network (Louwersheimer, et al., 2015).

In young adult Han Chinese subjects, the G allele was associated with lower functional connectivity density in the right inferior temporal gyrus (Shen, et al., 2016) and lower resting state functional connectivity between the hippocampus and the medial temporal gyrus (Shen et al., 2017). In the latter study, resting state functional connectivity between the hippocampus and the inferior frontal gyrus was influenced by an interaction between SORL1 and APOE genotypes, such that the presence of the SORL1 G allele had opposite effects in APOE E4 carriers and non-carriers.

In a study of healthy elderly Han Chinese living in Beijing, white-matter integrity in the cingulum bundle associated with the SNP 19 genotype in men but not women (Liang, et al., 2015).

Cognitive Function

SNP 19 did not associate with cognitive trajectory—verbal, spatial, memory and perceptual-speed performance—in a cohort of Swedes who were non-demented at baseline (Reynolds, et al., 2013). Nor did the variant associate with MMSE score in a cohort of Han Chinese over the age of 60 (Lin et al., 2017). However, in a study of healthy elderly Han Chinese, the SNP 19 genotype associated with executive function in men but not women (Liang, et al., 2015).

 

Functional Consequences

In a set of autopsy specimens from Caucasian donors with AD, the level of SORLA protein in the frontal cortex was lower in carriers of the SNP 19 G allele than in noncarriers, while the levels of SORL1 mRNA did not differ among the genotypes (Caglayan et al., 2012). An eQTL (expression quantitative trait locus) analysis found that the story might be more complicated, with pathology and brain region influencing the association between the allele and SORL1 expression: The G allele was associated with decreased levels of SORL1 mRNA in the temporal cortices of people with AD and in a dataset that combined specimens from subjects with AD, progressive supranuclear palsy, Lewy body dementia, corticobasal degeneration, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, multiple system atrophy, and vascular dementia. In the cerebellum, the G allele associated with increased SORL1 expression in the specimens with non-AD pathology, but it did not associate with SORL1 transcript levels in the AD specimens (Liu et al., 2017).

As noted above, SNP19 (G allele) is in linkage disequilibrium with SNP 22 (N1246N, C allele). The effect on SORL1 expression of a haplotype composed of these alleles was investigated in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with SORL1 mini-genes. Levels of SORLA protein were lower in cells carrying the SNP 19 and SNP 22 variants, compared with cells carrying the wild-type gene, while SORL1 mRNA levels did not differ between the genotypes. These findings suggest that the SNP19/SNP22 haplotype alters translation efficiency (Caglayan et al., 2012).

The SNP19 variant was predicted to be tolerated by SIFT and neutral by PROVEAN, and it was classified as a polymorphism by Mutation Taster (El Bitar et al., 2019).

Table

Risk Allele(s) N
Cases | Controls
(families)
aAllele frequency
Cases | Controls
Reported association measurements Ancestry
(Cohort)
Reference
Large-scale studies and meta-analyses
G b6095 | 8267   OR = 0.76
[CI: 0.54 - 1.06]
p = 0.11
Caucasian and Asian Cong et al., 2018
(meta-analysis)
b5514 | 7340   OR = 1.14
[CI: 0.87 - 1.49]
p = 0.35
Caucasian
b581 | 927   OR = 0.29
[CI: 0.07 - 1.22]
p = 0.09
Asian
G     OR = 0.89
[CI: 0.83 
- 0.96]
p = 2×10-3
(12 studies, allelic association, random effects model)
Caucasian, Asian Jin et al., 2013
(meta-analysis)
    OR = 0.85
[CI: 0.76 - 0.96]
p not reported
(12 studies, generalized odds ratio)
G 2032 | 5328   OR = 1.09
[CI: 0.99 - 1.19]
p =  0.09
French Caucasian Laumet et al., 2010
(GWAS)
G     OR = 1.20
[CI: 1.10 − 1.31]
reported not significant
cCaucasian Li et al., 2008
(meta-analysis)
G 17008 | 37154   dp = 0.0116 European
(IGAP)
Liu et al., 2017
(GWAS)
G 804 |  1190   OR = 1.33
[CI: 1.16 
1.52]
p <10-4
Chinese, Japanese Ning et al., 2010
(meta-analysis)
G AD + CTRL
19,206
  OR = 1.08
[CI: 1.01 
1.14]
ep = 0.02
Caucasian Reitz et al., 2011
(meta-analysis)
AD + CTRL
1443
  OR = 1.27
[CI: 1.10 
1.41]
p = 1×10-3
Asian
G 1270 Swedish AD cases, 2179 controls +
Alzgene cohorts (total 5331)
  OR = 0.89
[CI: 0.82 
0.97]
reported significant
European Reynolds et al., 2010
(meta-analysis)
G 1255 | 1938 0.23 | 0.22 OR = 1.1
[CI: 0.92  - 1.21]
p = 0.44
European
(European Early-Onset Dementia Consortium)
Verheijen et al., 2016
(meta-analysis)
G AD cases + controls
16,103
  OR = 1.13
[CI: 1.03 
1.23]
p = 9×10-3
Caucasian and Asian Wang et al., 2016
(meta-analysis)
    OR = 1.07
[CI: 1.02 
1.13]
reported significant
Caucasian
    OR = 1.26
[CI: 0.92 - 1.74]
reported not significant
Asian
Other studies
G 550 | 634 N.A. | 0.21 reported not significant Belgian (Engelborghs et al., 2003) Bettens et al., 2008
G 251 | 358 0.225 | 0.215 p = 0.68 Italian
(Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence)
Cellini et al., 2009
T 793 | 394 0.372 | 0.3985 OR = 0.89
[CI: N.A.]
p = 0.204
Han Chinese
(Taipei Veterans General Hospital and Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan)
Chou et al., 2016
G 117 | 0 0.205 | N.A.   Saudi Arabian
(King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center)
El Bitar et al., 2019
G 883 | 695 0.25 | 0.27 p = 0.41 Finnish
(Finnish-AD)
Elias-Sonnenschein et al., 2013
TT vs. TG+GG TT/TG/GG
AD: 0.57/0.37/0.06
CTRL: 0.54/0.39/0.07
OR = 0.88
[CI: 0.72 - 1.07]
p = 0.20
G 640 | 1268 0 | 0   Dutch
(Rotterdam Study, Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, Alzheimer Centrum Zuidwest Nederland (ACZN), 100-plus Study)
Holstege et al., 2017
G 437 | 450 0.490 | 0.437 OR = 1.53
[CI: 1.13 
2.05]
p = 0.025
Japanese
(Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Choju Medical Institute of Fukushimura Hospital)
Kimura et al., 2009
APOE ε4+
214 | 72
0.507 | 0.438 p = 0.149
APOE ε4-
223 | 378
0.473 | 0.490 p = 0.218
G 349 | 483 0.25 | 0.23 p = 0.41 German
(German Competence Network Dementias)
Kölsch et al., 2009
G 178 | 194 0.231 | 0.237 p = 0.8495 Caribbean Hispanic
(WHICAP)
Lee et al., 2007
88 | 158 0.098 | 0.132 p = 0.2786 African-American
(WHICAP)
30 | 76 0.300 | 0.194 p = 0.1216 White, non-Hispanic European
(WHICAP)
G 991 | 1027 0.252 | 0.223 p = 0.035 Caucasian
(Washington University Knight ADRC, Cardiff University)
Li et al., 2008
  859 | 549 0 | 0   not specified
(TGEN)
Meng et al., 2007
G 994 | 1001 0.221 | 0.224 p = 0.823 Caucasian American
(University of Pittsburgh ADRC)
Minster et al., 2008
G 144 | 476   OR = 1.73
[CI: 1.30
2.31]
p = 1.59×10-3
Chinese
(Shanghai Mental Health Center)
Ning et al., 2010
G 338 | 215 all = 0.19 OR = 1.03
[CI: 0.74 - 1.41]
p = 0.86
Italian, Swiss
(Memory Clinic of University “Sapienza” (Rome), Alzheimer’s Units of Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (Milan), Geriatric Division of the Ospedali Riuniti of Lugano and Mendrisio (Canton Ticino, Switzerland))
Piscopo et al., 2015
G 1270 | 2179   OR = 0.96
[CI: 0.86 - 1.08]
p = 0.52
Swedish
(Swedish Twin Registry, Mölndal Prospective Dementia Study, longitudinal geriatric study from Piteå, Sweden)
Reynolds et al., 2010
G 1554 | 2333 all = 0.238 OR = 1.18
[CI: 1.06–1.31]
p = 2.3×10-3
Combined Caucasian case-control datasets
(North European, Mayo Jacksonville, Mayo Rochester, Mayo autopsy)
Rogaeva et al., 2007
1400 | 2113 all = 0.234 OR = 1.13
[CI: 1.01–1.26]
p = 0.038
Combined Mayo series
178 | 242 all = 0.287 OR = 1.79
[CI: 1.27 - 2.53]
p = 8.2×10-4
North European
(case-control)
549 | 477 all = 0.224 OR = 1.14
[CI: 0.93 – 1.41]
p = 0.210
Mayo Jacksonville
433 | 1217 all = 0.242 OR = 1.19
[CI: 1.00 – 1.42]
p = 0.055
Mayo Rochester
423 | 430 all = 0.230 OR = 1.15
[CI: 0.92 – 1.44]
p = 0.225
Mayo autopsy
111 | 114 all = 0.236 OR = 1.16
[CI: 0.75 - 1.80]
p = 0.499
Israeli-Arab
(case-control)
(Wadi Area population study)
321 | 342
(42)
all = 0.207 p = 0.031 North European
[family]
605 | 517
(84)
all = 0.245 p = 0.617 Caribbean Hispanic
[family]
279 | 252
(58)
all = 0.277 p = 0.765 Caucasian [family]
(MIRAGE)
244 | 127
(22)
all = 0.175 p = 0.352 African-American [family]
(MIRAGE)
G 223 | 263 0.380 | 0.427 OR = 1.22
[CI: 0.94 - 1.57]
p = 0.140
Han Chinese Tan et al., 2009
T 156 | 221 0.49 | 0.46 reported significant Mexican
(Geriatric Clinic, “Mocel” General Hospital, Mexico City; Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Hospital de Alta Especialidad de Ixtapaluca; Geriatric Center, Querétaro)
Toral-Rios et al., 2022
TT+TG vs. GG TT/TG/GG
AD: 0.24/0.49/0.27
CTRL: 0.23/0.47/0.31
OR = 1.186
[CI: 0.75 – 1.88]
p = 0.469
T 77 | 100 0.558 | 0.44 OR = 1.6
[CI: N.A.]
p = 0.027
Han Chinese Xue et al., 2013

aAllele frequencies as reported by study authors or calculated by Alzforum curators from data provided in the study, assuming heterozygosity if not explicitly stated in the paper.
bCalculated by Alzforum curator from data supplied in paper; numbers of subjects are total for entire study and may not equal the number successfully genotyped for this particular variant.
cLi et al. and Rogaeva et al. Caucasian samples.
dMet criteria for “nominal” significance (p <0.05), according to authors.
eNo longer significant if Rogaeva omitted from the meta-analysis.

This table is meant to convey the range of results reported in the literature. As specific analyses, including co-variates, differ among studies, this information is not intended to be used for quantitative comparisons, and readers are encouraged to refer to the original papers. Thresholds for statistical significance were defined by the authors of each study. (Significant results are in bold.) Note that data from some cohorts may have contributed to multiple studies, so each row does not necessarily represent an independent dataset. While every effort was made to be accurate, readers should confirm any values that are critical for their applications.

Last Updated: 18 Jul 2024

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

References

Paper Citations

  1. . The neuronal sortilin-related receptor SORL1 is genetically associated with Alzheimer disease. Nat Genet. 2007 Feb;39(2):168-77. PubMed.
  2. . SORL1 Variants Show Different Association with Early-Onset and Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Risk. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(4):1121-1128. PubMed.
  3. . Meta-analysis of the association between variants in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2011 Jan;68(1):99-106. PubMed.
  4. . Meta-analysis of the Association between Alzheimer Disease and Variants in GAB2, PICALM, and SORL1. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Nov;53(9):6501-6510. Epub 2015 Nov 27 PubMed.
  5. . Sequence variation in SORL1 and dementia risk in Swedes. Neurogenetics. 2010 Feb;11(1):139-42. PubMed.
  6. . Association between SORL1 polymorphisms and the risk of Alzheimer's disease. J Integr Neurosci. 2018;17(2):239-251. PubMed.
  7. . SORL1 variants and risk of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2008 Feb;29(2):293-6. PubMed.
  8. . An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Association between SORL1 Variants and the Risk for Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(2):429-37. PubMed.
  9. . SORL1 gene, plasma biomarkers, and the risk of Alzheimer's disease for the Han Chinese population in Taiwan. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Dec 30;8(1):53. PubMed.
  10. . SORL1 Gene is Associated with the Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015 Jun 25;46(3):771-6. PubMed.
  11. . Characterization of pathogenic SORL1 genetic variants for association with Alzheimer's disease: a clinical interpretation strategy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Aug;25(8):973-981. Epub 2017 May 24 PubMed.
  12. . Identification of Alzheimer disease risk genotype that predicts efficiency of SORL1 expression in the brain. Arch Neurol. 2012 Mar;69(3):373-9. PubMed.
  13. . Amyloid-beta-Related Genes SORL1 and ACE are Genetically Associated With Risk for Late-onset Alzheimer Disease in the Chinese Population. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2010 Jul 9; PubMed.
  14. . SORL1 Polymorphisms in Mexican Patients with Alzheimer's Disease. Genes (Basel). 2022 Mar 25;13(4) PubMed.
  15. . Impact of SORL1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid markers. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011;32(3):164-70. PubMed.
  16. . Genetic loci associated with Alzheimer's disease and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in a Finnish case-control cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59676. PubMed.
  17. . SORL1 genetic variants and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jan 28; PubMed.
  18. . Validating predicted biological effects of Alzheimer's disease associated SNPs using CSF biomarker levels. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;21(3):833-42. PubMed.
  19. . Influence of SORL1 gene variants: association with CSF amyloid-beta products in probable Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett. 2008 Jul 25;440(1):68-71. PubMed.
  20. . The influence of genetic variants in SORL1 gene on the manifestation of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Mar;36(3):1605.e13-20. Epub 2014 Dec 11 PubMed.
  21. . Association of distinct variants in SORL1 with cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative changes related to Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2008 Dec;65(12):1640-8. PubMed.
  22. . Modulation effect of the SORL1 gene on functional connectivity density in healthy young adults. Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Nov;221(8):4103-4110. Epub 2015 Dec 1 PubMed.
  23. . Modulation of APOE and SORL1 genes on hippocampal functional connectivity in healthy young adults. Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Aug;222(6):2877-2889. Epub 2017 Feb 22 PubMed.
  24. . Sex moderates the effects of the Sorl1 gene rs2070045 polymorphism on cognitive impairment and disruption of the cingulum integrity in healthy elderly. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 May;40(6):1519-27. Epub 2015 Jan 19 PubMed.
  25. . Sortilin receptor 1 predicts longitudinal cognitive change. Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Jun;34(6):1710.e11-8. PubMed.
  26. . Association and interaction effects of Alzheimer's disease-associated genes and lifestyle on cognitive aging in older adults in a Taiwanese population. Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 11;8(15):24077-24087. PubMed.
  27. . Systematic analysis of candidate genes for Alzheimer's disease in a French, genome-wide association study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(4):1181-8. PubMed.
  28. . A comprehensive study of the genetic impact of rare variants in SORL1 in European early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Aug;132(2):213-24. Epub 2016 Mar 30 PubMed.
  29. . Prospective Belgian study of neurodegenerative and vascular dementia: APOE genotype effects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;74(8):1148-51. PubMed.
  30. . SORL1 is genetically associated with increased risk for late-onset Alzheimer disease in the Belgian population. Hum Mutat. 2008 May;29(5):769-70. PubMed.
  31. . Implication of sex and SORL1 variants in italian patients with Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2009 Oct;66(10):1260-6. PubMed.
  32. . Genetic Study of Alzheimer's Disease in Saudi Population. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(1):231-242. PubMed.
  33. . SORL1 is genetically associated with Alzheimer disease in a Japanese population. Neurosci Lett. 2009 Sep 18;461(2):177-80. PubMed.
  34. . Association of SORL1 gene variants with Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res. 2009 Apr 6;1264:1-6. PubMed.
  35. . The association between genetic variants in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease in an urban, multiethnic, community-based cohort. Arch Neurol. 2007 Apr;64(4):501-6. PubMed.
  36. . Association between SORL1 and Alzheimer's disease in a genome-wide study. Neuroreport. 2007 Nov 19;18(17):1761-4. PubMed.
  37. . No association of SORL1 SNPs with Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett. 2008 Aug 1;440(2):190-2. PubMed.
  38. . SORL1 haplotypes modulate risk of Alzheimer's disease in Chinese. Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Jul;30(7):1048-51. PubMed.
  39. . Association between the SORL1 rs2070045 polymorphism and late-onset Alzheimer's disease: interaction with the ApoE genotype in the Chinese Han population. Neurosci Lett. 2014 Jan 24;559:94-8. Epub 2013 Dec 3 PubMed.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Protein Diagram

Primary Papers

  1. . The neuronal sortilin-related receptor SORL1 is genetically associated with Alzheimer disease. Nat Genet. 2007 Feb;39(2):168-77. PubMed.

Disclaimer: Alzforum does not provide medical advice. The Content is for informational, educational, research and reference purposes only and is not intended to substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek advice from a qualified physician or health care professional about any medical concern, and do not disregard professional medical advice because of anything you may read on Alzforum.