Mutations

SORL1 N1246N (SNP 22)

Other Names: SNP 22

Overview

Clinical Phenotype: Alzheimer's Disease
Position: (GRCh38/hg38):Chr11:121586253 C>T
Position: (GRCh37/hg19):Chr11:121456962 C>T
dbSNP ID: rs1699102
Coding/Non-Coding: Coding
DNA Change: Substitution
Expected Protein Consequence: Silent
Codon Change: AAC to AAT
Reference Isoform: SORL1 Isoform 1 (2214 aa)
Genomic Region: Exon 27

Findings

This synonymous variant is one of the 29 SNPs reported by Rogaeva et al. in 2007 and has been reported subsequently in several other studies (see table). While C is the reference allele at this position, it generally has been reported as the minor allele in populations of European descent (Caucasian populations), while T was found to be the minor allele in Asian cohorts. The two alleles were found with nearly equal frequency in African Americans. Homozygous carriers have been found among both AD cases and controls. Allelic variation at this position was not found to associate with AD in several individual studies of cohorts of various ancestries, nor in meta-analyses.

The variant also was not associated with cognitive impairment in the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study (Driscoll et al., 2019), incident AD or cognitive function in Dutch subjects followed longitudinally for more than a decade (Liu et al., 2009), or risk or age of onset of AD in adults with Down syndrome (Lee et al., 2007). However, in a sample of non-demented Han Chinese, the T allele was associated with accelerated age-related changes in episodic memory and processing speed (Li et al., 2017).

The N1246N variant is classified as likely benign by the criteria of Holstege et al. (Holstege et al., 2017).

Biomarkers and Endophenotypes

Several studies investigated the association of the allele with fluid and imaging biomarkers.

One study found no association of the allele with levels of CSF core biomarkers— Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau —in a group of non-Hispanic Caucasians that contained control, MCI, and AD subjects (Alexopoulos, et al., 2011). However, in a group of German AD subjects, carriers of the C allele had lower levels of CSF Aβ42 than did non-carriers (Guo et al., 2012).  In the same study, CSF levels of other biomarkers related to APP metabolism—sAPPα, sAPPβ, and BACE1—and of SORL1 itself did not differ between genotypes in cognitively impaired (AD, MCI) subjects.

SNP 22 was not associated with brain atrophy or cerebrovascular disease assessed using MRI in Caucasian and African-American sibships from the MIRAGE study (Cuenco et al., 2008). However, in a sample of non-demented Han Chinese, the T allele was associated with atrophy of the right middle temporal pole (Li et al., 2017).

Linkage Disequilibrium

SNP 22 is in linkage disequilibrium with several other variants, including rs2070045 (SNP 19), rs3824966 (SNP 20), rs73595277 (SNP 21), rs3824968 (SNP 23), rs2282649 (SNP 24), rs726601, rs1784931, rs1010159 (SNP 25) in cohorts of European ancestry (Caglayan et al., 2012; Jin et al., 2013; Rogaeva et al., 2007) and rs2070045 (SNP 19), rs3824968 (SNP 23), rs2282649 (SNP 24), rs1010159 (SNP 25) in Asian cohorts (Jin et al., 2013).

 

 

Functional Consequences

In a set of autopsy specimens from Caucasian donors with AD, the level of SORL1 protein in the frontal cortex was lower in carriers of the SNP 22 C allele, in a gene-dose-dependent manner (Caglayan et al., 2012).

In neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells, SORL1 expression increased in response to BDNF, but the size of this response did not depend upon the SNP22 genotype (Young et al, 2015).

This variant is predicted to be tolerated by SIFT and neutral by PROVEAN, and is classified as a polymorphism by Mutation Taster (El Bitar et al., 2019).

Table

Risk Allele(s) N
Cases | Controls
(families)
aAllele frequency
Cases | Controls
Reported association measurements Ancestry
(Cohort)
Reference
Large-scale studies and meta-analyses
C     9 studies
allelic association, random effects model
OR = 1.10
[CI: 0.93 – 1.31]
p = 0.28
generalized odds ratio
OR = 0.99
[CI: 0.87 – 1.11]
p not reported
Caucasian, Asian

Jin et al., 2013
(meta-analysis)

 

C 2032 | 5328   OR = 1.03
[CI: 0.95 – 1.11]
p = 0.72
French Caucasian Laumet et al., 2010
(GWAS)
C 17008 | 37154   p = 0.8183 European
(IGAP)
Liu et al., 2017
(GWAS)
C 3658 | 9368 0.33  | 0.32 OR = 1.07
[CI: 1.00 – 1.14]
bp = 0.05
Caucasian Liu et al., 2009
(meta-analysis)
 
C AD + CTRL
20, 850
  OR = 1.03
[CI: 0.98 – 1.08]
p = 0.21
Caucasian Reitz et al., 2011
(meta-analysis)
AD + CTRL
865
  0.78
[CI: 0.60 – 1.05]
p = 0.07
Asian
C 1255 | 1938 0.33 | 0.33 OR = 1.04
[CI: 0.92 – 1.19]
p = 0.51
European
(European Early-Onset Dementia Consortium)
Verheijen et al., 2016
(meta-analysis)
Other studies
C 550 | 634 N.A. | 0.31 reported not significant Belgian
(Engelborghs et al., 2003)
Bettens et al., 2008
C 251 | 358 0.31 | 0.306 p = 0.85 Italian
(Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence)
Cellini et al., 2009
T 796 | 392 0.0861 | 0.0804 OR = 1.08
[CI: N.A.]
p = 0.637
Han Chinese
(Taipei Veterans General Hospital and Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan)
Chou et al., 2016
T 117 | 0 0.419 | N.A.   Saudi Arabian
(King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center)
El Bitar et al., 2019
T 640 | 1268 0.75 | 0.74   Dutch
(Rotterdam Study, Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, Alzheimer Centrum Zuidwest Nederland (ACZN), 100-plus Study)
Holstege et al., 2017
C 178 | 194 0.471 | 0.476 p = 0.9058 Caribbean Hispanic
(WHICAP)
Lee et al., 2007
88 | 158 0.466 | 0.487 p = 0.6572 African-American
(WHICAP)
30 | 76 0.446 | 0.329 p = 0.1192 White, non-Hispanic European
(WHICAP)
C 103 | 93 0.354 | 0.335 p = 0.7123 White, non-Hispanic (autopsy-confirmed) Lee et al., 2008
  859 | 549 0 | 0   not specified
(TGEN)
Meng et al., 2007
C 1554 | 2333 all = 0.334 OR = 1.08
[CI: 0.98 – 1.19]
p = 0.119
Combined Caucasian case-control datasets
(North European, Mayo Jacksonville, Mayo Rochester, Mayo autopsy)
Rogaeva et al., 2007
1400 | 2113 all = 0.336 OR = 1.09
[CI: 0.98 – 1.20]
p = 0.108
Combined Mayo series
178 | 242 all = 0.312 OR = 1.02
[CI: 0 .73 – 1.43]
p = 0.907
North European
(case-control)
549 | 477 all = 0.321 OR = 1.20
[CI: 1.00 – 1.45]
p = 0.052
Mayo Jacksonville
433 | 1217 all = 0.349 OR = 1.07
[CI: 0.91 – 1.26]
p = 0.413
Mayo Rochester
423 | 430 all = 0.331 OR = 1.13
[CI: 0.92 – 1.39]
p = 0.227
Mayo autopsy
T 111 | 114 all = 0.377 (C) OR = 1.47
[CI: 1.00 – 2.17]
p = 0.051
Israeli-Arab
[case-control]
(Wadi Area population study)
Rogaeva et al., 2007
C 321 | 342
(56)
all = 0.302 p = 0.056 North European
[family]
Rogaeva et al., 2007
605 | 517
(88)
all = 0.468 p = 0.386 Caribbean Hispanic
[family]
279 | 252
(59)
all = 0.367 p = 0.820  Caucasian [family]
(MIRAGE)
T 244 | 127
(37)
all = 0.473 (T) p = 0.254 African-American [family]
(MIRAGE)
Rogaeva et al., 2007
T 180 | 130 0.261 | 0.212 (T) Genotype frequencies do not significantly differ between cases and controls Japanese Shibata et al., 2008
T 223 | 263 0.116 | 0.081 (T) OR = 1.49
[CI: 0.97 – 2.27]
p = 0.067
Han Chinese Tan et al., 2009
T 156 | 221 0.39 | 0.33 reported not significant Mexican
(Geriatric Clinic, “Mocel” General Hospital, Mexico City; Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Hospital de Alta Especialidad de Ixtapaluca; Geriatric Center, Querétaro)
Toral-Rios et al., 2022
TT/TC/CC
AD: 0.17/0.44/0.40
CTRL: 0.12/0.42/0.47
OR = 1.334
[CI: 0.874 – 2.036]
p = 0.181

aAllele frequencies as reported by study authors or calculated by Alzforum curators from data provided in the study, assuming heterozygosity if not explicitly stated in the paper.
b”Borderline statistical significance,” per authors, which became non-significant when data from Rogaeva et al. are excluded.

 

This table is meant to convey the range of results reported in the literature. As specific analyses, including co-variates, differ among studies, this information is not intended to be used for quantitative comparisons, and readers are encouraged to refer to the original papers. Thresholds for statistical significance were defined by the authors of each study. (Significant results are in bold.) Note that data from some cohorts may have contributed to multiple studies, so each row does not necessarily represent an independent dataset. While every effort was made to be accurate, readers should confirm any values that are critical for their applications.

Last Updated: 18 Jul 2024

Comments

No Available Comments

Make a Comment

To make a comment you must login or register.

References

Paper Citations

  1. . The neuronal sortilin-related receptor SORL1 is genetically associated with Alzheimer disease. Nat Genet. 2007 Feb;39(2):168-77. PubMed.
  2. . A candidate gene study of risk for dementia in older, postmenopausal women: Results from the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 May;34(5):692-699. Epub 2019 Mar 7 PubMed.
  3. . A study of the SORL1 gene in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive function. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;18(1):51-64. PubMed.
  4. . Association between genetic variants in sortilin-related receptor 1 (SORL1) and Alzheimer's disease in adults with Down syndrome. Neurosci Lett. 2007 Sep 25;425(2):105-9. PubMed.
  5. . SORL1 rs1699102 polymorphism modulates age-related cognitive decline and gray matter volume reduction in non-demented individuals. Eur J Neurol. 2017 Jan;24(1):187-194. Epub 2016 Oct 25 PubMed.
  6. . Characterization of pathogenic SORL1 genetic variants for association with Alzheimer's disease: a clinical interpretation strategy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Aug;25(8):973-981. Epub 2017 May 24 PubMed.
  7. . Impact of SORL1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid markers. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011;32(3):164-70. PubMed.
  8. . SORL1 genetic variants and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jan 28; PubMed.
  9. . Association of distinct variants in SORL1 with cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative changes related to Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2008 Dec;65(12):1640-8. PubMed.
  10. . Identification of Alzheimer disease risk genotype that predicts efficiency of SORL1 expression in the brain. Arch Neurol. 2012 Mar;69(3):373-9. PubMed.
  11. . An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Association between SORL1 Variants and the Risk for Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(2):429-37. PubMed.
  12. . Systematic analysis of candidate genes for Alzheimer's disease in a French, genome-wide association study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(4):1181-8. PubMed.
  13. . SORL1 Variants Show Different Association with Early-Onset and Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Risk. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(4):1121-1128. PubMed.
  14. . Meta-analysis of the association between variants in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2011 Jan;68(1):99-106. PubMed.
  15. . A comprehensive study of the genetic impact of rare variants in SORL1 in European early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Aug;132(2):213-24. Epub 2016 Mar 30 PubMed.
  16. . Prospective Belgian study of neurodegenerative and vascular dementia: APOE genotype effects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;74(8):1148-51. PubMed.
  17. . SORL1 is genetically associated with increased risk for late-onset Alzheimer disease in the Belgian population. Hum Mutat. 2008 May;29(5):769-70. PubMed.
  18. . Implication of sex and SORL1 variants in italian patients with Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2009 Oct;66(10):1260-6. PubMed.
  19. . SORL1 gene, plasma biomarkers, and the risk of Alzheimer's disease for the Han Chinese population in Taiwan. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Dec 30;8(1):53. PubMed.
  20. . Genetic Study of Alzheimer's Disease in Saudi Population. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(1):231-242. PubMed.
  21. . The association between genetic variants in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease in an urban, multiethnic, community-based cohort. Arch Neurol. 2007 Apr;64(4):501-6. PubMed.
  22. . Association between genetic variants in SORL1 and autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008 Mar 11;70(11):887-9. PubMed.
  23. . Association between SORL1 and Alzheimer's disease in a genome-wide study. Neuroreport. 2007 Nov 19;18(17):1761-4. PubMed.
  24. . Genetic association between SORL1 polymorphisms and Alzheimer's disease in a Japanese population. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;26(2):161-4. PubMed.
  25. . SORL1 haplotypes modulate risk of Alzheimer's disease in Chinese. Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Jul;30(7):1048-51. PubMed.
  26. . SORL1 Polymorphisms in Mexican Patients with Alzheimer's Disease. Genes (Basel). 2022 Mar 25;13(4) PubMed.
  27. . Elucidating molecular phenotypes caused by the SORL1 Alzheimer's disease genetic risk factor using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2015 Apr 2;16(4):373-85. Epub 2015 Mar 12 PubMed.

Further Reading

No Available Further Reading

Protein Diagram

Primary Papers

  1. . The neuronal sortilin-related receptor SORL1 is genetically associated with Alzheimer disease. Nat Genet. 2007 Feb;39(2):168-77. PubMed.

Other mutations at this position

Disclaimer: Alzforum does not provide medical advice. The Content is for informational, educational, research and reference purposes only and is not intended to substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek advice from a qualified physician or health care professional about any medical concern, and do not disregard professional medical advice because of anything you may read on Alzforum.