Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
News Brief: What’s Up With Iplex?
22 May 2009. Its efficacy is unknown; it is untested in clinical trials, untried in mouse models, and, for the most part, unapproved by the Food and Drug Administration. But that hasn’t stopped some patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from trying Iplex. The drug garnered attention this week with a front-page story in last Sunday’s New York Times that chronicled a mother’s efforts to obtain Iplex for her son. The FDA is allowing a few patients to request “compassionate use” of the medication. Iplex, which was briefly available off-label for ALS, has since been pulled from the market in a patent dispute. It is currently available to Italian citizens with ALS.

Iplex is a complex of two recombinant human proteins: insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3). It is FDA-approved to treat short stature caused by IGF-1 deficiency in children. Scientists have long been eyeing IGF-1, known to have neuroprotective properties (for review, see Sullivan et al., 2008), as a potential ALS therapeutic. In vitro, it promotes axon outgrowth in corticospinal motor neurons (Özdinler and Macklis, 2006); in a mouse model of ALS, the growth factor delayed disease and prolonged survival (Nagano et al., 2005). But in clinical trials, subcutaneous IGF-1 injections have been a bit of a bust, with a handful of studies showing little or no effect (see ARF related news story and Sorenson et al., 2008). It is unknown how much, if indeed any, recombinant IGF-1 was able to cross the blood-brain barrier to reach motor neurons in those trials. Another approach under development is viral delivery of the IGF-1 gene; this prolongs survival in mouse models (Dodge et al., 2008).

“Iplex is kind of an IGF-1 me-too,” said Jeffrey Rothstein of the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. In the body, the majority of IGF-1 is bound to a binding protein, not free; in theory, the addition of the binding protein might give the growth factor better access to dying motor neurons. “It’s a scientifically interesting idea,” Rothstein said, but added that at this point there is not enough evidence to warrant human trials.

The FDA has released data on more than 100 Italian patients using Iplex. Among 24 people who took Iplex for a year, the average pre-treatment score on the ALS Functional Rating Scale was 30.2 ± 7.9, and the average score after 12 months was 25.2 ± 7.8. John McCarty, director of therapeutic investigations for the ALS Therapy Development Institute, discussed Iplex in an Institute webinar April 8. “My interpretation of the data is that it is not strongly consistent with a high degree of efficacy,” he said then. The Italian data do indicate that the drug is fairly safe; just five patients out of 110 discontinued treatment because of problems possibly related to Iplex.

The FDA reports that Insmed, the Richmond, Virginia-based company that makes Iplex, will conduct a clinical trial on Iplex for ALS. Until more data come out, Iplex remains an intriguing idea with next to no evidence to back it up.—Amber Dance.

 
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad