Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
SfN: The Old and the New—BACE and Cathepsin B Share the β-secretase Stage
20 November 2006. A lively platter of slide talks on APP processing and β-secretase (BACE) activities yielded a few interesting tidbits on the localization and regulation of β cleavage at this year’s annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in Atlanta, Georgia. The presentations also left the impression that cathepsin B, most recently in the news for digesting fibrillar Aβ (see ARF related news story), may yet have a role to play in the production of Aβ, as a β-secretase candidate protease.

Two talks focused on the localization and fluctuations of the BACE protein in brain. In the first, Matthew Kennedy and colleagues at Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, New Jersey, described a radio-labeled small molecule BACE inhibitor that specifically binds BACE in mouse tissues—there was no binding to brains from BACE knockout mice. In brain sections of 6-week-old mice, they detected inhibitor binding throughout the CNS, with higher levels in the CA2/3 regions of the hippocampus and in the olfactory bulb. Using transgenic CRND8-APPswe/ind AD mice that show very early plaque deposition (10-12 weeks of age), they found that BACE levels increase after plaque deposition. In the mice, they saw a 50 percent increase in BACE inhibitor binding only after 24-30 weeks. They also saw a change in localization of the protein to high-staining foci in the cortex, which appear to colocalize with plaques.

The delay in upregulation of BACE is at odds with data presented by Jie Zhao in Robert Vassar’s lab on a new monoclonal antibody they developed to BACE. (See our ARF Madrid story for Vassar’s talk on the antibody, which the lab produced by immunizing BACE knockout mice.) Unlike all commercial antibodies tested, which either recognized multiple proteins on Western blots, or stained the brains of BACE knockout just as well as wild-type mice, the new antibody was monospecific for BACE. Zhao’s immunostaining results revealed increased BACE in the 5XFAD APP/S1 (see ARF related news story) and Tg2576 transgenic mice around amyloid plaques. The BACE elevation occurred in parallel with the rise in amyloid burden in 5XFAD mice. Increases were also seen in brain of human AD patients.

Consistent with the labeled inhibitor experiments of the Schering-Plough group, Zhao showed colocalization of BACE around amyloid plaques. Confocal views revealed BACE in an outer ring of Aβ40 that surrounded the inner, Aβ42-rich plaque. From these and other recent results, Vassar and colleagues hypothesize that energy insufficiency stress, caused, for example, by vascular hypoperfusion, induces an increase in BACE. The subsequent amyloid deposition may itself further activate BACE. Peri-plaque BACE was found in association with neuronal markers.

In a related presentation, Sarah Cole, also at Northwestern, showed some early results from crossing BACE knockouts with the 5XFAD APP/S1 strain. When Cole and colleagues looked at 4-month-old BACE-heterozygous mice, they saw a normalization of early markers of neuronal stress, namely p25 protein and phospho p38 MAP kinase. Until the mice get older, the researchers won’t know if the pathology is actually prevented, or just delayed.

Is BACE the One and Only β-secretase?
The observation that knocking out BACE1 shuts down the constitutive production of Aβ from cultured neurons and the accumulation of Aβ in FAD mouse models has been taken as proof that BACE1 is the predominant enzyme responsible for β cleavage of APP. But is BACE really the only β-secretase? Work presented by Vivian Hook, University of California, San Diego, made a strong case for cathepsin B as an additional β-secretase with a role to play in the activity-regulated secretion of Aβ.

Hook and colleagues have proposed previously that the majority of Aβ is released from cells via regulated secretion, as in the activity-dependent production and release of Aβ at synapses. According to their hypothesis, only a small amount of extracellular Aβ would derive from constitutive secretion, the BACE-dependent pathway through which Aβ makes its way into the conditioned medium of cultured neurons. The researchers, who have long studied the processing and release of neuropeptides, proposed this model based on their studies of adrenal chromaffin cells, which are widely used as a model of regulated secretion of neurotransmitters. In these cells, they have identified cathepsin B as the major β-secretase activity in secretory vesicles. BACE1 is present in the vesicles but accounts for only a small part of the total processing activity during KCl or nicotine-stimulated secretion. From these results, Hook and colleagues have proposed that cathepsin B could be the main β-secretase in neurons (Hook et al., 2002; Hook and Reisine, 2003; Hook et al., 2005).

One reason why cathepsin B has been overshadowed by BACE could be that, as Hook and colleagues demonstrated several years ago, the enzyme prefers to cleave wild-type APP, and displays much lower activity toward the altered site created by the Swedish mutation. The mutant sequence is preferred by BACE, and pops up in many of the FAD animal models which have been used to study the role of BACE in vivo. For studying β-cleavage inhibitors, Hook and coworkers favor the guinea pig model, which has a wild-type APP sequence that matches the β-secretase cleavage site in humans.

Hook used that animal to look at the role of cathepsin B in APP processing in the CNS. In her talk, she showed that infusion of selective cathepsin B inhibitor CA-074Me into the brains of guinea pigs reduced Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels by approximately one-half. In a second talk, Hook showed that another cathepsin B inhibitor, loxistatin, had the same effect after direct intracerebroventricular infusion. She saw decreased production of Aβ and the C-terminal β-secretase fragment of APP in the brain and in isolated synaptosomes. These results suggest that cathepsin B does participate in Aβ production in vivo as a β-secretase, and that inhibitors may have some potential as Aβ-lowering agents. This work is now in press in Biological Chemistry, Hook said.

A listener was quick to ask how Hook could reconcile her results with the recent paper from Li Gan showing that AD mice with the cathepsin B gene knocked out have worse plaque pathology than mice with the enzyme (see ARF related news story). In that study, the researchers found no evidence that cathepsin B acted as a secretase, but in fact found that it was able to degrade Aβ fibrils.

Hook pointed out that the AD mouse model used in that paper (the hAPP J20 line) incorporated the Swedish mutation, which could explain why the researchers saw no evidence for APP processing by cathepsin B. In animals with wild-type human APP, there could be a different outcome. Clearly, there is a lot more work to be done, but the data so far suggest that where Aβ production is concerned, BACE may be just one part of the story.—Pat McCaffrey.

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Mary Reid
Submitted 22 November 2006  |  Permalink Posted 28 November 2006

Taha and colleagues (1) find that sphingosine kinase-1 is a substrate for cathepsin B. I note the studies by the Iribarren and Kaneider groups (2,3) and wonder about the effect of cathepsin B inhibitors on formyl peptide receptor-like-1/sphingosine kinase activity and whether this would alter amyloid-β1-42 uptake.

References:
1. Taha TA, El-Alwani M, Hannun YA, Obeid LM. Sphingosine kinase-1 is cleaved by cathepsin B in vitro: Identification of the initial cleavage sites for the protease. FEBS Lett. 2006 Nov 13;580(26):6047-54. Epub 2006 Oct 12. Abstract

2. Iribarren P, Chen K, Hu J, Gong W, Cho EH, Lockett S, Uranchimeg B, Wang JM. CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotide promotes microglial cell uptake of amyloid beta 1-42 peptide by up-regulating the expression of the G-protein- coupled receptor mFPR2. FASEB J. 2005 Dec;19(14):2032-4. Epub 2005 Oct 11. Abstract

3. Kaneider NC, Lindner J, Feistritzer C, Sturn DH, Mosheimer BA, Djanani AM, Wiedermann CJ. The immune modulator FTY720 targets sphingosine-kinase-dependent migration of human monocytes in response to amyloid beta-protein and its precursor. FASEB J. 2004 Aug;18(11):1309-11. Epub 2004 Jun 18. Abstract

View all comments by Mary Reid


  Comment by:  Greg Hook (Disclosure)
Submitted 1 February 2008  |  Permalink Posted 19 February 2008

Further to the discussion regarding cathepsin B β-secretase activity, our recent paper (1) shows that inhibitors of cathepsin B improve memory and reduce brain plaque, Aβ, and β-secretase activity in transgenic AD mice expressing human APP containing the wild-type, but not the Swedish mutant, β-secretase site. This result was expected based on the preference of cathepsin B to cleave a wild-type, but not Swedish mutant, β-secretase substrate.

Cathepsin B's inability to efficiently cleave the Swedish mutant β-secretase substrate also predicted that knocking out cathepsin B in animals expressing APP containing that mutated site would have little or no effect on β-secretase activity of the mutated site, which is what Li Gan and colleagues found (2). Thus, our results are consistent with that finding.

In contrast, BACE1 has such poor cleavage efficiency for the wild-type β-secretase site that Schechter and colleague postulate that there must be another β-secretase responsible for this cleavage (3). We suggest that cathepsin B has such β-secretase activity for the wild-type...  Read more


  Comment by:  Robert Vassar, ARF Advisor
Submitted 21 February 2008  |  Permalink Posted 21 February 2008

Reply to comment by Greg Hook
I don't see solid evidence for the argument that BACE1 is not β- secretase. Dr. Hook claims that cathepsin B, not BACE1, is the β-secretase for wild-type APP. If so, then BACE1 knockouts mated to wild-type APP transgenics should still make Aβ and develop plaques. This experiment has, in fact, been done (McConlogue et al., 2007). The PDAPP mouse used in this study has the 717 London mutation, but it is wild-type at the β-secretase cleavage site, and the 717 mutation has no effect on β-secretase cleavage. McConlogue and colleagues definitively show by Aβ ELISA and immunohistochemistry that the PDAPP/BACE1 KO bigenics are devoid of Aβ and plaques. If cathepsin B were the β-secretase for wild-type APP, then there should have been no effect on Aβ and plaques in the PDAPP/BACE1 KO bigenics. I suspect that the cathepsin B inhibitors used in Hook et al., 2008 were not selective at the concentrations used and had pleiotrophic effects that altered Aβ...  Read more

  Comment by:  Greg Hook (Disclosure)
Submitted 27 February 2008  |  Permalink Posted 15 April 2008

I appreciate Dr. Vassar’s comment posted in response to my comment based on our new article, which supports the hypothesis that cathepsin B is a β-secretase in addition to BACE1 (Hook et al., 2008).

Our main point is that cysteine protease inhibitors deserve further development as potential AD therapeutics because they are efficacious in two animal models relevant to AD. Significantly, they improve memory and reduce brain amyloid plaque in transgenic AD mice expressing human APP containing the wild-type β-secretase site, with reduction in brain Aβ and β-secretase activity (Hook et al., 2008). These results are supported by the effectiveness of these inhibitors to reduce brain Aβ and β-secretase activity in the normal guinea pig, which also expresses APP containing the wild-type β-secretase site (Hook et al., 2007b; Hook et al., 2007a; Hook et al., 2008). Since most AD patients have the wild-type β-secretase site, these compounds have the potential to translate into effective AD therapeutics.

Our biochemical and...  Read more


  Comment by:  Li Gan
Submitted 18 April 2008  |  Permalink Posted 22 April 2008

I agree that the roles of cysteine proteases in Aβ metabolism deserve in-depth investigation, and findings obtained with both genetic and pharmacological approaches should be evaluated in greater detail.

In agreement with Dr. Vassar’s comments, the two inhibitors used in Dr. Hook’s study, CA074-Me and E-64c, are not specific for cathepsin B. E-64c is a pan-cysteine protease inhibitor, capable of inhibiting papain, cathepsins, and calpains. In contrast to CA-074 (Murata et al., 1991), which is highly specific for cathepsin B, its methyl ester derivative CA-074-Me completely lost its cathepsin B specificity (Bogyo et al., 2000), becoming capable of inhibiting cathepsin S (Bogyo et al., 2000), cathepsin L (Montaser et al., 2002), and several unidentified polypeptides (Bogyo et al., 2000). Indeed, CA-074-Me abrogated staurosporine-induced cell death in a cathepsin B-independent manner (Mihalik et al., 2004), possibly via reversing lysosomal acidification and mitochondria depolarization (Mihalik et al., 2004). This underscores the complexity of sorting out the mechanisms of any...  Read more


  Comment by:  Greg Hook (Disclosure)
Submitted 13 November 2009  |  Permalink Posted 13 November 2009

In response to Drs. Vassar and Gan’s opinion that cathepsin B knockout experiments are the “cleanest way to resolve” if cathepsin B has a role in producing Aβ, I point out that we recently conducted such experiments and found that deleting the cathepsin B gene in transgenic mice expressing human wild-type APP results in about 70 percent and 40 percent less brain Aβ and CTFβ, respectively, than in their transgenic controls expressing cathepsin B (Hook et al., 2009). As most Alzheimer disease patients express wild-type APP, these knockout data suggest that cathepsin B has a role in producing Aβ in most Alzheimer disease patients.

Furthermore, new data by others show that siRNA silencing cathepsin B reduces Aβ secretion by primary rat hippocampal neurons (Klein et al., 2009). Rat APP contains the human wild-type β-secretase site sequence, and thus these data are consistent with the cathepsin B gene knockout data discussed above.

These new data, along with our previously discussed...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad