In order to prevent spam,
this email address cannot be copied.
Researcher Profile - Fred van Leeuwen Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: Community: Researcher Profiles
Researcher Profile

RESEARCHER INFORMATION
First Name:Fred
Last Name:van Leeuwen
Title:Dr.
Advanced Degrees:PhD
Affiliation:University Maastricht
Department:Cellular Neuroscience
Street Address 1:Universiteitssingel 50
City:Maastricht
Zip/Postal Code:6200 MD
Country/Territory:Netherlands
Phone:31 20 3881044
Fax:31 20 3671096
Email Address: 
Disclosure:
(view policy) 
 
View all comments by Fred van Leeuwen
Clinical Interests:
Polyglutamine Disorders (Huntington's, etc.), Alzheimer Disease, Prion Diseases, Neuromuscular Disorders (ALS, etc.), Aging Process, Neurodevelopmental Disorders (Down syndrome, etc.), Parkinson Disease, Tauopathies
Research Focus:
A-beta PP/A-beta, Animal Models, Apoptosis/Cell cycle, Neuroimmunology, Chemistry/Pharmacology, Oxidative Stress, DNA microarrays, Signal transduction, Stem cells, Genetics, Microscopy, Molecular and Cell biology, Neurobiology, Neuropathology, Neurotransmission, Protein structure/chemistry, Proteomics, Electrophysiology, Tau/Cytoskeleton
Work Sector(s):
University
Web Sites:
Personal: f.vanleeuwen@np.unimaas.nl
Professional: f.vanleeuwen@np.unimaas.nl
Lab: f.vanleeuwen@np.unimaas.nl
Researcher Bio
Dr. F.W. van Leeuwen is a neuroscientist with over 100 peer-reviewed scientific papers to his name. His team works at the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (formerly the Netherlands Institute for Brain Research) in Amsterdam, which is an institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. He was trained as a neurobiologist and obtained his PhD degree in 1980.
After branching out into the field of molecular neurobiology in the nineties, he discovered a new mechanism, dubbed molecular misreading; the inaccurate conversion of genomic information into aberrant transcripts and mutant proteins (e.g. mutant ubiquitin B, UBB+1). These appeared to be present in the hallmarks (e.g. plaques and tangles) of sporadic Alzheimer and Down syndrome patients, but not in young non-demented controls. This was the cover story of Science 279, January 9th, 1998. The message is that the mutant proteins accumulate and contribute to neuronal dysfunctioning, e.g. by inhibiting the ubiquitin-proteasome system. This article has been named a “milestone paper”, and Dr. van Leeuwen has been invited to participate in an Alzheimer-100 book because it was 100 years ago that Dr. Alzheimer published his first article on the disease.
Ubiquitin is a molecule that plays a role in a large number of tasks, for example the degradation of aberrant proteins, an important discovery, for which in 2004 the Nobel prize in Chemistry was awarded to three colleagues, including Ciechanover, who made the following remark about the publication by van Leeuwen: “Perhaps the most compelling evidence for the involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in Alzheimer pathogenesis. The recent unraveling of the fascinating UBB+1 story by van Leeuwen suggests that we may soon see many more completely novel mechanisms involved in neuronal degeneration” (Neuron 40, 427 ff, 2003). UBB+1 is an indicator for proteasomal dysfunction which shows up specifically in tauopathies but not in synucleinopathies (e.g. Parkinson’s disease). Recently UBB+1 was also detected in the hallmarks of polyglutamine diseases (e.g. intranuclear inclusions) and found to strongly contribute to aggregate formation and neuronal death (in vivo). A US patent was obtained on this discovery (# 5,958,684).
Top Papers
Science 279, 242ff, 1998 and numerous subsequent papers on misframed proteins, in particular ubiquitin and the ubiquitin-proteasome system that have appeared in the peer reviewed literature( see pubmed).
What is the greatest void to date in our knowledge of Alzheimer's Disease?
No effective treatment at all
What are the top three papers (not yours) you have read recently?
Not really. I am afraid that the disease is to complex.
A link between the ubiquitin-proteasome system and Abeta has been shown and opens new horizons for straightforward (Song et al., Mol. Cell 12, 553ff, 2003, Gong et al., Cell 126,775ff, 2006).
If resources were not limited, what research projects would you pursue?
To identify the main players in the ubiquitin-proteasome system (around 1000 candidates are available !) and to validate their contribution to AD and other conformational diseases.
What is your leading hypothesis?
An efficient ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS)is of utmost importance to gaurantee cellular homeostasis.
What piece of missing evidence would help prove it?
More research in the UPS. At the last AD meeting there was hardly any contribution on this topic.This is curious as the "ubiquitin family" (See CSH symposia) belongs to those that grow very rapid. It is "Time for the ubiquitin-proteasome system"(see also my comments on this site!). Also the studies on the autopaghy-lysosomal system by collegues like Nixon and Cuervo need to be implemented much more.
This is still an open niche!!!!!!!
What is your fallback position?
I am appointed here at Maastricht University

Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad